- Was the new department head wrong for the position?
- Are the core issues outside their scope of control?
- Did you select the wrong constraint?
- All of the above?
Sunday, August 31, 2008
Talent vs. Patents vs. Employee Turnover
Some older posts get a lot of action...
And by the way, today is Sunday. Did you do any dream building? Me too. It was great. Then I took the vRod out through the backwoods... almost at the end of this winding country road, a sport bike flies past me headed East. I was West bound... and quick u turn, and in about two miles I caught up to him. The vRod does very well... nearly as well as my Buell. But I digress.
Looking over record hits for the month of August (most unique visitors ever!), I noticed a hit to an older post about IBM vs. Apple. But I have been wrestling with turn over issues for some length of time, and today, they seemed to collide into a new vantage point.
Remember my post (and the book) "the dream manager" from January?
Case Study: You do the requisite "bitch & moan" session looking for the weakest link in your business. You do the logic trees... and determine the weakest link. Well, 90 days later, you find employee turn over is still well over 100% on an annual rate.
Now what?
Maybe it is nothing, maybe it needs addressed. Consider the case where we determined the original weakest link was a department head position that had been unfilled for months. So, we filled it... and 90 days later the turn over is still too high in that department.
blog comments powered by Disqus